Complex hyperplasia with and without atypia: clinical outcomes and implications of progestin therapy

Author(s): Reed SD, Newton KM, Garcia RL, Allison KH, Voigt LF, et al.

Abstract

Objective: Limited data exist to inform clinicians and patients as to the likelihood of long-term endometrial hyperplasia response to progestin therapy, especially for atypical hyperplasia. We evaluated women with complex and atypical endometrial hyperplasia, comparing those prescribed progestin with those not prescribed progestin.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted in 1985-2005 among women aged 18-88 years at an integrated health plan in Washington State. Women were ineligible if they achieved an outcome (endometrial carcinoma, hysterectomy, or both) within 8 weeks of hyperplasia diagnosis. Exposure was progestin use for at least 14 days by duration and recency. Outcomes included rate of 1) endometrial carcinoma, 2) hysterectomy, or 3) both. Analyses performed included Kaplan-Meier, incident rate ratios, and Cox proportional hazard ratios.

Results: One thousand four hundred forty-three eligible women were identified. One thousand two hundred one had complex (n=164 no progestin) and 242 had atypical (n=62 no progestin) hyperplasia. During follow-up, a median of 5.3 years (range 8 weeks to 20.8 years), 71 women were diagnosed with endometrial carcinoma (35 complex, 36 atypia) and 323 underwent hysterectomy (216 complex, 107 atypia). Among women with complex and atypical hyperplasia, rates of endometrial carcinoma among progestin users were 3.6 and 20.5 per 1,000 woman-years, respectively (compared with women who did not use progestin, 10.8 and 101.4). Among women with complex and atypical hyperplasia, rates of hysterectomy among progestin users were 23.3 and 61.4 per 1,000 woman-years, respectively (compared with women who did not use progestin, 55.1 and 297.3).

Conclusion: Endometrial carcinoma risk is diminished approximately threefold to fivefold in women diagnosed with complex or atypical endometrial hyperplasia and dispensed progestin; hysterectomy risk is also decreased.

Level of evidence: II.

Similar Articles

Incidence of endometrial hyperplasia

Author(s): Reed SD, Newton KM, Clinton WL, Epplein M, Garcia R, et al.

Seromucinous Tumors of the Ovary

Author(s): Kurman RJ, Shih IeM

Absolute risk of endometrial carcinoma during 20-year follow-up among women with endometrial hyperplasia

Author(s): Lacey JV Jr, Sherman ME, Rush BB, Ronnett BM, Ioffe OB, et al.

Modifiable risk factors for cancer

Author(s): Stein CJ, Colditz GA

Risk factors for endometrial hyperplasia: results from a case-control study

Author(s): Ricci E, Moroni S, Parazzini F, Surace M, Benzi G, et al.

High rate of endometrial hyperplasia in renal transplanted women

Author(s): Bobrowska K, Kamiński P, Cyganek A, Pietrzak B, Jabiry-Zieniewicz Z, et al.

Clinical parameters linked with malignancy in endometrial polyps

Author(s): Gregoriou O, Konidaris S, Vrachnis N, Bakalianou K, Salakos N, et al.

Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses

Author(s): Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG

Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis

Author(s): Higgins JP, Thompson SG

Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test

Author(s): Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C

Prevalence of endometrial cancer and hyperplasia in non-symptomatic overweight and obese women

Author(s): Viola AS, Gouveia D, Andrade L, Aldrighi JM, Viola CF, et al.

Risk factors for adenomatous endometrial hyperplasia: a case-control study

Author(s): Kreiger N, Marrett LD, Clarke EA, Hilditch S, Woolever CA

Endometrial hyperplasia risk in relation to recent use of oral contraceptives and hormone therapy

Author(s): Epplein M, Reed SD, Voigt LF, Newton KM, Holt VL, et al.

The incidence of co-morbidities related to obesity and overweight: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author(s): Guh DP, Zhang W, Bansback N, Amarsi Z, Birmingham CL, et al.

Characteristics of women with a family history of ovarian cancer

Author(s): Cramer DW, Barbieri RL, Muto MG, Kelly A, Brucks JP, et al.

Cigarette smoking, relative weight, and menopause

Author(s): Willett W, Stampfer MJ, Bain C, Lipnick R, Speizer FE, et al.

Tobacco smoking and cancer: a meta-analysis

Author(s): Gandini S, Botteri E, Iodice S, Boniol M, Lowenfels AB, et al.

Smoking and colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis

Author(s): Botteri E, Iodice S, Bagnardi V, Raimondi S, Lowenfels AB, et al.

An aggregated analysis of hormonal factors and endometrial cancer risk by parity

Author(s): Schonfeld SJ, Hartge P, Pfeiffer RM, Freedman DM, Greenlee RT, et al.

IUD use and the risk of endometrial cancer

Author(s): Benshushan A, Paltiel O, Rojansky N, Brzezinski A, Laufer N

Risk factors among young women with endometrial cancer: a Danish case-control study

Author(s): Parslov M, Lidegaard O, Klintorp S, Pedersen B, Jønsson L, et al.

A case-control study of cancer of the endometrium

Author(s): Kelsey JL, LiVolsi VA, Holford TR, Fischer DB, Mostow ED, et al.

Epidemiology of endometrial cancer

Author(s): Elwood JM, Cole P, Rothman KJ, Kaplan SD

Family history and the risk of endometrial cancer

Author(s): Parazzini F, La Vecchia C, Moroni S, Chatenoud L, Ricci E