Evaluation of criteria for distinguishing atypical endometrial hyperplasia from well-differentiated carcinoma

Author(s): Kurman RJ, Norris HJ

Abstract

Endometrial curettings from 204 patients containing severe forms of atypical hyperplasia, carcinoma in situ, and well-differentiated carcinoma were compared with subsequent hysterectomy specimens to evaluate and identify the most useful histologic criteria for predicting the presence of invasive carcinoma. Endometrial stromal invasion, increased degrees of nuclear atypism, mitotic activity, cellular stratification, and epithelial necrosis in curettings were associated with a greater likelihood of carcinoma in the uterus. Of these, stromal invasion was the most significant feature. When stromal invasion was absent, carcinoma was present in the uterus in only 17%, and the carcinomas were well differentiated and confined to the endometrium or only superficially invasive. When stromal invasion was present in curettings, residual carcinoma was present in the uterus in half, and of these, one third were moderately or poorly undifferentiated and a quarter invaded deeply into the myometrium. The criteria for invasion are 1) an irregular infiltration of glands associated with an altered fibroblastic stroma or desmoplastic response; 2) a confluent glandular pattern in which individual glands are uninterrupted by stroma and merge to form a cribriform pattern of stromal replacement; 3) an extensive papillary pattern; and 4) replacement of stroma by masses of squamous epithelium. To qualify as invasion, 2, 3, and 4 must occupy at least one half (2.1 mm) of low power field 4.2 mm in diameter. Because of the important role of stromal invasion in predicting prognosis, future classifications of endometrial neoplasia should utilize this feature in distinguishing atypical hyperplasia from well differentiated adenocarcinoma.

Similar Articles

Incidence of endometrial hyperplasia

Author(s): Reed SD, Newton KM, Clinton WL, Epplein M, Garcia R, et al.

Seromucinous Tumors of the Ovary

Author(s): Kurman RJ, Shih IeM

Absolute risk of endometrial carcinoma during 20-year follow-up among women with endometrial hyperplasia

Author(s): Lacey JV Jr, Sherman ME, Rush BB, Ronnett BM, Ioffe OB, et al.

Modifiable risk factors for cancer

Author(s): Stein CJ, Colditz GA

Complex hyperplasia with and without atypia: clinical outcomes and implications of progestin therapy

Author(s): Reed SD, Newton KM, Garcia RL, Allison KH, Voigt LF, et al.

Risk factors for endometrial hyperplasia: results from a case-control study

Author(s): Ricci E, Moroni S, Parazzini F, Surace M, Benzi G, et al.

High rate of endometrial hyperplasia in renal transplanted women

Author(s): Bobrowska K, Kamiński P, Cyganek A, Pietrzak B, Jabiry-Zieniewicz Z, et al.

Clinical parameters linked with malignancy in endometrial polyps

Author(s): Gregoriou O, Konidaris S, Vrachnis N, Bakalianou K, Salakos N, et al.

Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses

Author(s): Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG

Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis

Author(s): Higgins JP, Thompson SG

Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test

Author(s): Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C

Prevalence of endometrial cancer and hyperplasia in non-symptomatic overweight and obese women

Author(s): Viola AS, Gouveia D, Andrade L, Aldrighi JM, Viola CF, et al.

Risk factors for adenomatous endometrial hyperplasia: a case-control study

Author(s): Kreiger N, Marrett LD, Clarke EA, Hilditch S, Woolever CA

Endometrial hyperplasia risk in relation to recent use of oral contraceptives and hormone therapy

Author(s): Epplein M, Reed SD, Voigt LF, Newton KM, Holt VL, et al.

The incidence of co-morbidities related to obesity and overweight: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author(s): Guh DP, Zhang W, Bansback N, Amarsi Z, Birmingham CL, et al.

Characteristics of women with a family history of ovarian cancer

Author(s): Cramer DW, Barbieri RL, Muto MG, Kelly A, Brucks JP, et al.

Cigarette smoking, relative weight, and menopause

Author(s): Willett W, Stampfer MJ, Bain C, Lipnick R, Speizer FE, et al.

Tobacco smoking and cancer: a meta-analysis

Author(s): Gandini S, Botteri E, Iodice S, Boniol M, Lowenfels AB, et al.

Smoking and colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis

Author(s): Botteri E, Iodice S, Bagnardi V, Raimondi S, Lowenfels AB, et al.

An aggregated analysis of hormonal factors and endometrial cancer risk by parity

Author(s): Schonfeld SJ, Hartge P, Pfeiffer RM, Freedman DM, Greenlee RT, et al.

IUD use and the risk of endometrial cancer

Author(s): Benshushan A, Paltiel O, Rojansky N, Brzezinski A, Laufer N

Risk factors among young women with endometrial cancer: a Danish case-control study

Author(s): Parslov M, Lidegaard O, Klintorp S, Pedersen B, Jønsson L, et al.

A case-control study of cancer of the endometrium

Author(s): Kelsey JL, LiVolsi VA, Holford TR, Fischer DB, Mostow ED, et al.

Epidemiology of endometrial cancer

Author(s): Elwood JM, Cole P, Rothman KJ, Kaplan SD

Family history and the risk of endometrial cancer

Author(s): Parazzini F, La Vecchia C, Moroni S, Chatenoud L, Ricci E