Bone-anchored hearing aid implant location in relation to skin reactions

Author(s): Faber HT, Wolf MJF, Rooy WJ

Abstract

Objective  To evaluate the effect of implant location and skin thickness on the frequency and degree of adverse skin reactions around the abutment.

Design  Retrospective multivariate analysis of implant position related to skin thickness and clinical variables.

Setting  Tertiary referral center.

Patients  Random sample of 248 patients with bone-anchored hearing aids.

Interventions  Bone-anchored hearing aid implant placement by means of the linear incision technique.

Mean Outcome Measures  Type and number of skin reactions and implant loss.

Results  The mean (SD) distance from the external auditory ear canal to implant was 48.8 (8.0) mm (range, 29-84 mm). The mean skin thickness was 5.5 (1.9) mm. Severe skin reactions (Holgers classification, 2-4) were seen in 46 of the 248 patients (18.5%). Implant loss occurred in 4 patients (1.6%). Three implants were lost owing to failed osseointegration (1.3%), and another implant was removed because of deterioration of cochlear function (0.9%). No implant was lost as a result of infection.

Conclusion  Implant location and skin thickness were not correlated with implant loss or the frequency or degree of adverse skin reactions around the abutment.

Similar Articles

Complications of bone-anchored hearing devices

Author(s): Wazen JJ, Wycherly B, Daugherty J