Targeting insulin inhibition as a metabolic therapy in advanced cancer: A pilot safety and feasibility dietary trial in 10 patients

Author(s): Fine EJ, Segal-Isaacson CJ, Feinman RD, Herszkopf S, Romano MC, et al.

Abstract

Objective

Most aggressive cancers demonstrate a positive positron emission tomographic (PET) result using 18F-2-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose (FDG), reflecting a glycolytic phenotype. Inhibiting insulin secretion provides a method, consistent with published mechanisms, for limiting cancer growth.

Methods

Eligible patients with advanced incurable cancers had a positive PET result, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 2, normal organ function without diabetes or recent weight loss, and a body mass index of at least 20 kg/m2. Insulin inhibition, effected by a supervised carbohydrate dietary restriction (5% of total kilocalories), was monitored for macronutrient intake, body weight, serum electrolytes, β-hydroxybutyrate, insulin, and insulin-like growth factors-1 and -2. An FDG-PET scan was obtained at study entry and exit.

Results

Ten subjects completed 26 to 28 d of the study diet without associated unsafe adverse effects. Mean caloric intake decreased 35 ± 6% versus baseline, and weight decreased by a median of 4% (range 0.0–6.1%). In nine patients with prior rapid disease progression, five with stable disease or partial remission on PET scan after the diet exhibited a three-fold higher dietary ketosis than those with continued progressive disease (n = 4, P = 0.018). Caloric intake (P = 0.65) and weight loss (P = 0.45) did not differ in those with stable disease or partial remission versus progressive disease. Ketosis was associated inversely with serum insulin levels (P = 0.03).

Conclusion

Preliminary data demonstrate that an insulin-inhibiting diet is safe and feasible in selected patients with advanced cancer. The extent of ketosis, but not calorie deficit or weight loss, correlated with stable disease or partial remission. Further study is needed to assess insulin inhibition as complementary to standard cytotoxic and endocrine therapies.

Similar Articles

A low-carbohydrate as compared with a low-fat diet in severe obesity

Author(s): Samaha FF, Iqbal N, Seshadri P, Chicano KL, Daily DA, et al.

Nutrition and acne: Therapeutic potential of ketogenic diets

Author(s): Paoli A, Grimaldi K, Toniolo L, Canato M, Bianco A, et al.

Effect of 6-month adherence to a very low carbohydrate diet program

Author(s): Westman EC, Yancy WS, Edman JS, Tomlin KF, Perkins CE

The ketogenic diet: one decade later

Author(s): Freeman JM, Kossoff EH, Hartman AL

Ketogenic diet does not affect strength performance in elite artistic gymnasts

Author(s): Paoli A, Grimaldi K, D’Agostino D, Cenci l, Moro T, et al

The ketogenic diet: Adolescents can do it, too

Author(s): Mady MA, Kossoff EH, McGregor AL, Wheless JW, Pyzik PL, et al.

Long-term effects of a very low-carbohydrate diet and a low-fat diet on mood and cognitive function

Author(s): Brinkworth GD, Buckley JD, Noakes M, Clifton PM, Wilson CJ

Ketosis and appetite-mediating nutrients and hormones after weight loss Eur J Clin Nutr 67: 759-764

Author(s): Sumithran P, Prendergast LA, Delbridge E, Purcell K, Shulkes A, et al.

The ketogenic diet: Adolescents can do it, too

Author(s): Mady MA, Kossoff EH, McGregor AL, Wheless JW, Pyzik PL, et al.